Avatar Bowel Program Clinical Study PIEE - Pulsed Irrigation Procedure
(NOTE: The Avatar model was the first model created for the PIE* System)
Veterans Administration Medical Center of Denver and the University of Colorado Medical Center
The Avatar Bowel Evacuation Procedure has been developed for individuals
who experience difficulty in episodic or chronic bowel evacuation. The Avatar
uses a new principle called PIEE, Pulsed Irrigation for Enhanced Evacuation.
Body temperature tap water is pulsed into the rectal ampulla via a speculum.
The tap water is infused in short pulses of a few seconds, alternated with
a draining period, allowing water and stool to flow by gravity into a sealed
container. This process effectively stimulates the nerves of the rectal ampulla
to induce peristaltic action or act as a vehicle for stool removal for patients
with atonic colons. Concurrently, water pulses act to loosen, disperse, and
enhance the removal of stool via the natural lubricating action of the water.
A low volume of 25 - 100 cc's of water is infused into the rectum per pulse
cycle. A typical pulse cycle is between 1-4 seconds in duration. The maximum
pressure does not exceed 2 pounds per square inch.
Methods
The study is divided into three phases. The first phase is the establishment
of a baseline of medical data regarding the subject's current bowel program
(14 days). The second phase is a 90 day period of time during which subjects
replace current bowel programs with the PIEE Procedure on a daily basis
for the first 30 days and on alternate days for the next 60 days. The third
phase is a 30 day period, during which both manual and medicinal methods
directly related to bowel care are replaced such that the Avatar is the
sole procedure relating to each subject's bowel care needs. Safety and
efficacy were addressed by the following measurements:
Safety of the PIEE Procedure was measured with respect to the following parameters:
1. Blood chemistry (Panel 3 and CBC) during all phases of
the study.
2. The mucosal health established by flexible sigmoidoscopy
during phase one and upon completion of phase two.
3. Bowel wall integrity established by flexible sigmoidoscopy
during phase one and upon completion of phase two.
4. Autonomic dysreflexia or other blood pressure/pulse changes
are measured by:
4-a. Average baseline systolic and diastolic pressure and resting
heart rate for each subject/incidence of peak systolic/diastolic (in excess
of 40 mmHg above resting) during or immediately after completion of the
Avatar bowel program. See Charts
Efficacy of the PIEE Procedure was measured relative to each subject's
existing bowel program in terms of the following:
1. Change in frequency in bowel related accidents over time.
2. Change in amount of time spent in performing the bowel program
on a daily basis.
3. Change in subjective levels of gas present in the colon.
4. Subjective perception of benefits and efficiencies of the
PIEE Procedure. See chart for the above.
A total of 22 subjects were selected from the local veterans population
of adult males with a history of neurogenic bowel disorders.
Fourteen subjects were excluded for geographical, etiological,
or pre-existing gastro-intestinal
conditions.
Electrolytes Disturbed?
Results - Safety.
Blood electrolytes are not affected
in any manner by long-term
use of the PIEE Procedure (Table 1)
TABLE1: INDIVIDUAL SUBJECT'S ELECTROLYTES
Days of Study
|
Sodium
|
Chloride
|
Potassium
|
Calcium
|
Phosphorus
|
Incidence of Out of Range
|
|
|
|
Patient #1
|
|
|
|
Baseline
|
142
|
102
|
4.3
|
9.4
|
3.9
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
139
|
105
|
4.8
|
9.6
|
3.6
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
140
|
103
|
4.6
|
8.8
|
3.8
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
140
|
103
|
4.6
|
8.8
|
3.8
|
NONE
|
|
|
|
Patient #2
|
|
|
|
Baseline
|
141
|
106
|
4
|
9.7
|
3.9
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
139
|
108
|
3.4
|
8.7
|
3.6
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
143
|
109
|
4.1
|
9.2
|
3.8
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
141
|
108
|
4.2
|
9.5
|
3.6
|
NONE
|
|
|
|
Patient #3
|
|
|
|
Baseline
|
141
|
104
|
4.5
|
9.1
|
3.5
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
141
|
107
|
4.1
|
9.1
|
3.5
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
141
|
107
|
4
|
9
|
2.7
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
140
|
103
|
4.5
|
9.2
|
4.8
|
NONE
|
|
|
|
Patient #4
|
|
|
|
Baseline
|
143
|
111
|
4.8
|
9.2
|
3.6
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
140
|
103
|
3.8
|
8.4
|
3.3
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
139
|
105
|
4.1
|
9
|
3.2
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONE
|
|
|
|
Patient #5
|
|
|
|
Baseline
|
137
|
96
|
3.5
|
8.8
|
4.4
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
132
|
91
|
3.5
|
9
|
3.8
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
136
|
99
|
3.6
|
8.6
|
3.6
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
139
|
105
|
4.1
|
9
|
3.2
|
NONE
|
|
|
|
Patient #6
|
|
|
|
Baseline
|
142
|
106
|
4.8
|
10.9
|
3.4
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
142
|
106
|
4.8
|
10.9
|
3.4
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
142
|
106
|
4.4
|
10.4
|
3
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
141
|
107
|
4.2
|
10.4
|
3
|
NONE
|
|
|
|
Patient #7
|
|
|
|
Baseline
|
140
|
105
|
4.2
|
9
|
4.2
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
138
|
102
|
4.7
|
8.9
|
3.5
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
137
|
101
|
3.8
|
8.9
|
3.2
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
136
|
99
|
3.8
|
8.5
|
3.6
|
NONE
|
Blood Elements?
The blood elements of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and WBC are not
affected by the PIEE Procedure (Table 2).
Table #2
INDIVIDUAL SUBJECT HEMOGLOBIN, HEMATOCRIT AND WBC OVER 90 DAYS OF THE STUDY
Days of Study
|
Hemoglobin
|
Hematocrit
|
WBC
|
Incidence of Out of Range
|
|
|
Patient #1
|
|
|
Baseline
|
17.90
|
53.30
|
6.30
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
18.70
|
56.80
|
5.70
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
18.20
|
54.50
|
6.20
|
NONE
|
|
|
Patient #2
|
|
|
Baseline
|
15.80
|
46.70
|
5.90
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
15.60
|
47.00
|
5.10
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
15.40
|
45.20
|
5.50
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
15.70
|
46.30
|
5.20
|
NONE
|
|
|
Patient #3
|
|
|
Baseline
|
16.20
|
48.70
|
10.40
|
WBC
|
30 Day
|
16.20
|
50.90
|
9.50
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
16.70
|
51.30
|
7.10
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
16.90
|
50.50
|
7.20
|
NONE
|
|
|
Patient #4
|
|
|
Baseline
|
16.30
|
48.20
|
10.50
|
WBC
|
30 Day
|
17.30
|
50.30
|
15.90
|
WBC
|
60 Day
|
17.50
|
50.90
|
7.70
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
15.40
|
44.20
|
4.70
|
NONE
|
|
|
Patient #5
|
|
|
Baseline
|
16.40
|
47.50
|
4.20
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
16.90
|
51.00
|
4.20
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
16.60
|
48.50
|
5.00
|
NONE
|
|
|
Patient #6
|
|
|
Baseline
|
15.30
|
46.70
|
6.40
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
|
|
|
|
60 Day
|
15.60
|
47.50
|
7.10
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
15.00
|
44.60
|
6.90
|
NONE
|
|
|
Patient #7
|
|
|
Baseline
|
13.80
|
41.10
|
4.90
|
NONE
|
30 Day
|
14.00
|
41.40
|
4.30
|
NONE
|
60 Day
|
14.80
|
43.80
|
4.20
|
NONE
|
90 Day
|
15.40
|
44.20
|
4.70
|
NONE
|
Blood Pressure?
The resting blood pressure and the resting pulse rate of the person using the
PIEE Procedure are not affected in any manner over long term use (Table 3).Table #3
MEAN AND STD. DEV. OF RESTING B/P AND HEART RATE
SYSTOLIC
|
|
Std. Dev.
|
Phase II Mean
|
Std. Dev.
|
Patient #1
|
125
|
6
|
128
|
7
|
Patient #2
|
130
|
0*
|
115
|
7
|
Patient #3
|
109
|
1
|
93
|
12
|
Patient #4
|
130
|
5
|
143
|
5
|
Patient #5
|
105
|
6
|
107
|
10
|
Patient #8
|
115
|
0
|
114
|
7
|
Patient #9
|
153
|
5
|
131
|
12
|
Patient #11
|
112
|
0*
|
112
|
5
|
DIASTOLIC
|
Baseline Mean
|
Std. Dev.
|
Phase II Mean
|
Std. Dev.
|
Patient #1
|
81
|
8
|
81
|
3
|
Patient #2
|
80
|
0
|
71
|
8
|
Patient #3
|
76
|
11*
|
63
|
8
|
Patient #4
|
98
|
1
|
105
|
6
|
Patient #5
|
78
|
4
|
74
|
9
|
Patient #8
|
77
|
8
|
76
|
8
|
Patient #9
|
96
|
6
|
90
|
10
|
Patient #11
|
72
|
0*
|
78
|
8
|
PULSE
|
Baseline Mean
|
Std. Dev.
|
Phase II Mean
|
Std. Dev.
|
Patient #1
|
84
|
6
|
81
|
82
|
Patient #2
|
59
|
0
|
71
|
70
|
Patient #3
|
90
|
8*
|
63
|
81
|
Patient #4
|
71
|
3
|
105
|
72
|
Patient #5
|
85
|
7
|
74
|
88
|
Patient #8
|
86
|
10
|
76
|
82
|
Patient #9
|
63
|
4
|
90
|
75
|
Patient #11
|
88
|
0*
|
78
|
76
|
1 Test: For each of the 3 measurements of vital signs, there
was no significant difference in the mean value between baseline
and Phase II to a 95% confidence limit.
F Test: For each of the 3 measurements of vital signs, there was no significant
difference in the variances Between Baseline and Phase II to a 98% confidence
limit.
*Sample size of 1 or no change in daily resting B/P
Autonomic Dysreflexia?
The PIEE Procedure shows a positive improvement regarding vital signs (reflective
of autonomic dysreflexia with respect to prior bowel programs) (Figure 1).
Figure 1
RESULTS – EFFICACY
The subjects' responses to the PIEE Procedure are expressing preference toward
the procedure over their prior programs (Table 5).
Table 5
SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES OF STUDY SUBJECTS
Subjective Criteria: |
|
Response: |
|
Better
|
As Good
|
Worse
|
Overall Rating: Avatar vs. Baseline
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
|
More
|
No Change
|
Less
|
Amount of Bowel Gas
|
0
|
2
|
6
|
|
More
|
Same
|
or Less
|
Confidence regarding bowel control
|
5
|
|
3
|
|
Yes
|
|
No
|
Is the Avatar program comfortable?
|
7
|
|
1
|
Is time saved using PIE?
|
5
|
|
3
|
Have more bowel control?
|
6
|
|
2
|
Wish to continue with PIE?
|
8
|
|
0
|
Will continue to use if VA pays cost?
|
8
|
|
0
|
Continue at personal expense?
|
3
|
|
5
|
|