*3423 Pulsed Irrigation Evacuation: A Better Technique for Colon Cleansing?
The study below represents only a poster presentation that
was used to acquire the financing of a 500 patients study.
The financing was provided by the American College of Gastrology
and will be completed before the end of 2001.
An expansion of the poster study below has been submitted
for publication and this is anticipated to occur in 2002.
This poster presentation does represent and major breakthrough
in mild alternative colon preparation for many colon studies.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Digestive Disease Week April 2000, Part 2 · Volume 51 · Number 4
*3423 PULSED IRRIGATION EVACUATION: A BETTER TECHNIQUE FOR COLON CLEANSING?
Kamran Ayub, Waqar Quershi, Rosetta Brown,
Rhonda A. Cole, David Y. Graham
VA Med Ctr, Houston, TX.
Background: The first, and possibly most critical, step
in colonoscopy is to have an adequately prepared colon. Unfortunately,
none of the currently used colon cleansing regimens are completely
satisfactory both in terms of patient complaints of unpleasant
side effects and in terms of failure to provide a clean colon.
The failure rate with traditional preparation is typically
10 to 30 %. We used the Pulsed Irrigation Evacuation (PIE)
device for colon cleansing. This device administers warm
tap water through a cuffed speculum with microprocessor-timed
pulses of inflow and outflow. The rehydrated fecal matter
is collected in a closed system that is discarded. The PIE
technique is FDA approved for the management of fecal impaction.
We hypothesized that use of PIE should result in rapid colon
cleansing for colonoscopy with minimal patient discomfort.
Methods: Consecutive outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy
were offered the opportunity to participate. Main exclusion
criteria were suspected bowel obstruction, previous colon
resection, and severe congestive heart failure.
Patients were advised to take clear liquids after 1 PM on
the day prior to examination, one bottle of magnesium citrate
(165 ml) the evening prior to examination and were kept NPO
after midnight. Upon arrival to the Endoscopy suite, PIE
was performed until the return was clear, followed by colonoscopy.
Endoscopic photographs were taken in each segment of the
colon, and video recordings were made. Patient discomfort
during colon cleansing was assessed by a questionnaire. The
quality of colon cleansing was graded using a previously
used scoring system during the procedure. Two Endoscopists
also independently graded the quality of colon cleansing
based on the photographs/video.
Results: 20 consecutive patients participated (mean age
= 60 yr - range of 45-80 yr). PIE was well tolerated. The
only side effect was mild abdominal cramps during large pulses.
Colonoscopy preparation was complete to the cecum or terminal
ileum in all.
Colon cleansing was graded as acceptable or better in all
(100% success: excellent = 4 patients, good = 15 patients,
acceptable = 1 patient). The average time for cleansing was
25 minutes (range 20 to 35) and typically, approximately
6 gallons of water was required. Five patients had previous
colonoscopy with GoLytely preparation and all preferred PIE.
Conclusions: PIE Prep results in optimal and rapid colon
cleansing while causing minimal patient discomfort. It could
be used as a primary colon preparation or for same day cleansing
of those with poor traditional preparation.
The results indicated that there was no comparison between
the PIE* Prep and the traditional means. Our method was
accepted much higher for both the patient/physician.
A much larger study with Dr. David Graham is being funded
by the "American College of Gastroenterology".
In this much larger study the Medical team is comparing
Golytley, Phosphosoda, the traditional chemical Colon prep,
against the PIE* Prep and comparing their effectiveness and
patient satisfaction. Dr. Graham reports a total of 80 patients
have been completed so far with PIE Prep showing excellent
results over the chemical methods. Dr. Graham intends to
include 500 patients and expects to have it completed by
December 2001.
|